The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » moving toward paint by number songwriting and production?
moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:27 Go to next message
Chris Latham is currently offline  Chris Latham   UNITED STATES
Messages: 109
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86143 is a reply to message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html

More troubling is that if they can do that, you can bet they're working hard
on going "OK, well, if we know what makes a hit through mathematics, then
surely we can make them..."

....bye bye songwriter...

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86149 is a reply to message #86143] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
My guess is that Nickelback would get the same exact rating on the range of
hits so far
(tic)

AA

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:46662b25$1@linux...
>
> "Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html
>
> More troubling is that if they can do that, you can bet they're working
> hard
> on going "OK, well, if we know what makes a hit through mathematics, then
> surely we can make them..."
>
> ...bye bye songwriter...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86154 is a reply to message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
"Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html

I have no doubt that songwriting of major pop music will be essentially a
computer affair within 50 years, and probably a lot less. I mean, how far
is Desmond Child from a computer as it is? Computers are awfully close to
being able to beat any human in chess right now, and there is no endeavor
on earth that involves predicting what an opponent will prefer more than
that game. Writing a hit for Fergie should be a lot easier than beating Gary
Kasparov.

But I don't listen to that stuff anyway, and I promise that no computer will
every write the song my band is working on right now called 'Jimmy Carter
Saves the Day' and it's about Jimmy Carter going around his native region
handing out Viagra.

And the South, and the South, and the South will rise again

TCB
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86181 is a reply to message #86136] Wed, 06 June 2007 01:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sarah is currently offline  Sarah   UNITED STATES
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
Senior Member
Well, hasn't pop music been "paint by numbers" for decades? Seems like it
was only a matter of time before they used computers instead of A&R men to
make sure music fans aren't exposed to any dangerous originality.

Sarah

"Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:46661da3$1@linux...
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html
>
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86194 is a reply to message #86181] Wed, 06 June 2007 07:15 Go to previous message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
All these things provide opportunities for innovators...

DC



"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>Well, hasn't pop music been "paint by numbers" for decades? Seems like it

>was only a matter of time before they used computers instead of A&R men
to
>make sure music fans aren't exposed to any dangerous originality.
>
>Sarah
>
>"Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:46661da3$1@linux...
>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190335,00.html
>>
>
>
Previous Topic: Don't bother with Firefox 2.0.0.4
Next Topic: Pics from outdoor show
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Dec 27 09:57:18 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10287 seconds